A Instance Way to Get Your GRE Score

ELPIS categorizes all methods used in the market for GRE cheating into the following categories, along with their definitions. Many of the following methods are no longer available due to the second camera policy implemented in January 2026.

We may not guarantee you’ll pick us to be your GRE cheating service provider, but we are 100% sure you won’t get burned by a scam after reading this guide.

Ready for a score that opens every Ivy League door? 

Click here

An Overview of GRE Cheating History and Techniques

Before choosing a preparation path, it is important to understand how each method bypasses test monitoring, and what its strengths and weaknesses are.

Split Screen Assistance

Using a mobile phone or micro-camera placed in the blind spot of the camera to secretly photograph the test questions.
Click Here

TIME ZONE EXPLOITATION

Leveraging time zone differences to obtain test answers in advance (more common in TOEFL; GRE time-zone-based sessions are extremely rare and often imprecise).
Learn More

Prediction/Leaked Questions

Knowing the exam questions ahead of time. Traditional review often emphasizes volume, but not enough diagnosis or adjustment.
Click Here

Using Remote Control Software

Installing a modified version of commercial remote desktop software or an obscure remote software to secretly view the screen.
Click Here

What are Our Methods

For ETS-administered exams, including the GRE and TOEFL, we provide two primary options: the Trojan (No-Intervention) Solution and the Fully Remote Control Solution. Both are identical in terms of security and success rates, offering full immunity against current and future retrospective reviews. Neither solution is inherently “safer,” as both are engineered to provide the highest level of protection.

In essence, these two methods achieve the same objective through different technical means: they fundamentally prevent testing authorities from capturing any data via Al, proctoring footage, or system monitoring. Because no compromising information is ever recorded, there is no basis for a retrospective review. Once your score is released, it remains secure. The choice between the two depends entirely on your specific location and personal preference. For a tailored recommendation, please consult our customer service team.

 

 Zero-Intervention Trojan​

By deploying a sophisticated Trojan operating at Ring 0 (kernel level), our system gains the highest possible privileges, allowing it to interact directly with the hardware. It captures screen data by reading BitBlt information directly from the system buffer and reconstructing it into realtime images. Because it operates at this fundamental level, the Trojan requires no traditional drivers or visible processes, creates no detectable background activity, and avoids standard application-layer TCP/UDP data transmissions.

The defining advantage of this approach is that the Trojan does not alter or interfere with the exam software. By operating within the Windows kernel, it remains entirely invisible to the system’s native Task Manager and third-party monitoring tools. Proctoring software, which functions at the less-privileged application layer (Ring 3), is incapable of detecting a kernel-level process. Consequently, retrospective reviews of the proctoring logs show perfectly normal activity, ensuring that scores remain secure and immune to retroactive cancellation.

 

Fully Remote Control Solution

Building on the foundation of the Zero-Intervention Trojan, this solution allows for direct control of the test-taker’s keyboard and mouse to complete the exam. The student’s only requirement is to remain present in front of the camera-removing all operational burden.

While this may seem like a minor technical step beyond the Trojan, it represents a significant breakthrough. The ETS exam system imposes exceptionally stringent restrictions on remote operations, which typically result in two major barriers:

  • Visual Blocking: Any standard attempt to remotely view the test-taker’s screen results in a total black screen.
  • Input Filtering: Even if the visual block is bypassed, the exam system is designed to filter out and block all remote clicks or keystrokes.

Currently, no other agency in the market possesses the technical capability to provide a fully remote solution that completely bypasses these ETS monitoring protocols. When other providers claim that “fully remote control is insecure,” they are often masking a lack of the advanced engineering required to achieve it.

Because our Fully Remote Control Solution is built directly upon the Zero-Intervention Trojan, it inherits the same elite stealth characteristics. Operating at the kernel level, it remains invisible to the Windows Task Manager, third-party security tools, and proctoring software. During retrospective reviews, the data reported by the testing authority appears entirely normal, with no evidence of remote interaction available for discovery. Consequently, scores achieved through this method are permanent and immune to retroactive cancellation.

What's Next

Step-by-Step Guide
GRE Demo
Contact Us
x

GRE Split Screen Assistance

This technique utilizes a hardware splitter to mirror identical content across two monitors: one positioned in front of the student and another discreetly wired to an adjacent room for a proxy test-taker. In this setup, the student’s keyboard and mouse are merely decoys; the actual input devices controlling the exam are operated by the proxy in the secondary location.
Modern detection technologies for HDMI and DisplayPort (DP) connections have become highly sophisticated in identifying these split-screen configurations. Primary detection methods include:
EDID (Extended Display Identification Data) Verification: Analyzing display signatures to identify unauthorized hardware or inconsistencies.
I2C Channel Probing: Attempting to modify or verify device identity information stored at address Ox50 on the I2C channel to expose hidden splitters.

x

GRE Time Zone Exploitation

While time-zone-based cheating occurs in some TOEFL sessions, the GRE’s adaptive format makes it nearly impossible to implement. For agencies, the high cost of obtaining all possible test versions for a single session makes the service difficult to sell because a high volume of users would create suspicious score patterns. Furthermore, agencies often fear that students might independently leak or resell the content.
Students also face significant hurdles: they would need to memorize upwards of nine question sets, which is unrealistic for a quick turnaround. Although there is a theoretical 12-hour time difference between regions, the actual preparation time is much shorter after accounting for data extraction. Due to these inefficiencies, this approach remains an expensive, low-demand “solution” in the GRE market.

x

GRE Leaked/prediction questions

Since the GRE is an adaptive test with an extremely large question bank, it is nearly impossible to accurately determine which specific set of questions will be used on a given day and time simply by collecting past questions. In reality, the test on a given day may consist of 9 out of 50 possible question sets (taking all adaptive scenarios into account). Even if a student could obtain all 50 sets in advance, it would be impractical— there is no way to memorize 50 full sets of questions just hours before the exam.
A new strategy, known as “database matching,” has emerged. In this model, students photograph the first three questions of each section and send them to an external organization, which then provides answers for the full section. Under optimal conditions, this involves 13 photographs: one for the essay and twelve across the four remaining sections (three per section). This method requires students to test on a specific date and time to ensure the organization’s question bank aligns with the active exam version.
However, this approach has a significant drawback: it concentrates users into a limited number of test sessions. This clustering creates anomalous score distributions and a high frequency of identical responses, prompting ETS to issue mass cancellations. Consequently, legitimate test-takers in the same sessions are often caught in the crossfire, seeing their results flagged for prolonged review.

x

GRE Remote control

Beginning in July 2022, ETS implemented a rigorous crackdown on remote access and screen-sharing software, rendering the vast majority of commercial tools obsolete. While a select few remained functional through late 2023, many test agencies lack the technical expertise to develop truly undetectable solutions. Consequently, the software they employ is frequently identified during retrospective reviews, leading to widespread score cancellations.